
a guide to untangling the different types of attraction for the confused, curious, + queer
For a long time, I assumed my experience with attraction was typical. I felt desire. I had crushes. I hooked up, flirted, fantasized. It all looked close enough to what I saw around me that I didnāt question it too deeply.
But something always felt a little⦠off.
Not in a *dramatic*, something-is-broken wayājust a quiet sense of being out of sync. I chalked it up to being plus-size in a fatphobic world1 (which definitely shaped how others responded to me). But over time, I started to notice that the disconnect wasnāt just external. There was something internal, tooāsomething about how I experienced connection and attraction that didnāt quite match the script.
I didnāt have the language yet to describe what I was experiencing. I just knew that things didnāt quite spark the way they were āsupposedā to. That connection felt elusive, that attraction rarely lined up with timing, that something wasnāt syncing the way it seemed to for other people.
Turns out, I didnāt start understanding my own ~queerness~ until I began unraveling how attraction and desire actually work.
Not how weāre taught theyāre supposed to work. Not the Hollywood version, or the health class diagram, or the swipe-right algorithm. But how they show up in real life, in real bodies, in real mindsāespecially for those of us who are neurodivergent, queer, or just paying attention.
As you begin to discover the nuances of attraction and desire, understanding your own experiences can feel like trying to untangle a ball of necklace chains you pulled out of the $1 bin at the thrift store. Itās messy, weirdly knotted, and occasionally makes you question your entire sense of reality. But once you get it sorted? Everything suddenly makes a lot more sense.
In this post, weāll explore:
- The different types of attraction humans can experience (hint: itās more than just sexual or romantic).
- How ćdesireć differs from ā attraction ā (+ why that distinction matters).
- How this understanding helped me recognize my identities as demisexual and bisexual (+ possibly aegosexual).
Along the way, Iāll share bits of my own journey, offer some cheeky definitions, and gently pry open space for anyone whoās been quietly wondering: āAm I queer?ā or āIs it normal to feel like this?ā
Spoiler: Youāre not broken, and yes, itās normal.
Attraction isnāt a monolith.
Itās a spectrum of sensation.
Before I could understand what was happening inside me, I had to learn that attraction isnāt just a single flashing neon sign. Itās more like a constellationāmultiple points of light that might align or drift apart or never show up at all.
Hereās a taste of the different ways people can experience attraction:

Wanting to build intimacy through shared lifeādates, partnership, long walks. Maybe even matching enamel mugs.
Feeling a pull to engage in sexual activity with a specific person. Often treated as the main event, but itās just one part of the larger map.


Wanting physical closeness or touch that isnāt inherently sexualāhugging, cuddling, hair stroking, etc.
That buzz when someoneās mind feels electric to youātheir thoughts, ideas, insights. Brain crushes are real.


Craving connection and vulnerability. Wanting to know someone deeply and be known by them in return.
Noticing beauty. Finding someone visually striking or compelling, the way youād admire a work of art.

We can feel some of these at once. We can feel them at different times, or never.
They donāt always arrive in the same order or with the same intensity.
For some people, they rarely show up at all. For others, they come on fast and loud and often.
There is no “correct” pattern.
Attraction ā Desire: A Crucial Distinction
Perhaps most importantly: attraction is an involuntary experience. It just happens. You might feel drawn to someoneās energy, their face, their mind, their ~vibe~. You donāt choose to be attracted to someone any more than you choose your favorite color. It arises involuntarilyāan internal signal we canāt manufacture or erase at will.
Desire, on the other hand, is intentional. Itās about wanting something, or someone, and being willing (or not) to act on that want. This is key because desire is often influenced by context, values, culture, and conscious choice, while attraction bubbles up from somewhere deeper, often without warning or explanation.2
Desire can be broken down even further into 1) libido, 2) favorability, & 3) positivity.
And then there’s also arousal, which is a whole other thing!

Desire, of any type, doesnāt necessarily require attraction to be present first. You can experience desireāfor sex, for closeness, for connectionāwithout feeling an identifiable attraction to a specific person. And sometimes, when that desire is acted upon or directed at someone, it can be misread (by ourselves or others) as attraction. Sometimes it does go hand-in-hand with attraction. But not always.
This difference matters because desire is rooted in agency. Itās about the will to move toward something or someone. Itās an active choice: to fantasize, to pursue, to initiate, to lean in. It’s not always rational. But unlike attraction, it’s something we can cultivate, redirect, suppress, or reframe.
Desire can bloom where attraction hasnāt yet landed. It can also wane in places where attraction once thrived.
And that distinction? It changed how I saw my entire sexual history.
My (long, winding) Path to the Words That Fit
Iāve always had a strong desire for sex. A high libido. A very sex positive POV. A fascination with the psychology and dynamics of sex, even before I ever had it (which, apparently, is often connected to neurospiciness, though the research is still slim3).
For a long time, that desire, combined with being raised in a heteronormative culture and a lifetime of unconscious masking, led me to believe I was straight. I must be, because thatās how desire was supposed to look. And I had it, right?
But underneath, something always felt… amiss. I was drawn to queer people. I surrounded myself with them. I was an outspoken ally before I even really understood what queerness meant.
I felt queer in ways I couldnāt explain (and in ways I could, but that werenāt connected to queerness at the time)āyet I didnāt think I had a āvalid enoughā claim to the label. And despite my full, genuine allyship, I wasnāt exactly clamoring to join a community that, on a larger scale, faced social ostracization and legal oppression.
Looking back, though, there were signs. I remember telling friends in high school that I wished I were bisexual because it āsounded better.ā (Foreshadowing, much? š )
Learning about demisexuality was the first click. A friend described it as someone who doesnāt experience sexual attraction until after an emotional connection is formed. I said, āI might be that⦠but donāt a lot of people feel that way?ā She replied, āWell, I can feel sexual attraction to someone just by looking at themālike, imagine having sex with them even if I donāt know them yet.ā
And I thought, Oh. Huh. Thatās not how it works for me.
Not without a connectionāemotional, intellectual, or something grounding usāfirst.
That realization cracked something open. Still, I second-guessed it.
Iād had one-night stands.
Iād had fun.
Iād initiated.
Iād experimented.
I didnāt look demisexual the way others described it. But that didnāt mean the label didnāt fit.
Because identity isnāt about checking boxes.
Itās about ćresonanceć .
And when I let go of needing someone else to validate that label for me, I finally started to feel like I made sense.

A few years later, I had another moment of realization about my queer identity. Oddly, it happened at a Weezer concertānot your typical “queer awakening” setting, but for better or worse, itās on my bingo card (itās for better, Weezer kicks ass live!). I was a little tipsy and a little highāpractically the āfree spaceā on the bingo cardāand, as often happens when Iām in that state, I was feeling ~ frisky ~. The sexual fantasies were happening, and then, out of nowhere, there was a woman in the fantasyānot a particular woman, but a distinctly feminine body with female sex characteristicsāand we were engaging with one another, and I was still enjoying it.
As any self-respecting academically trained person would do after such an experience, I immediately started researching bisexuality and reading othersā stories. Upon reflection, I began to recognize bisexual patterns in my feelings and experiences. I entertained the possibility of feeling attracted to certain women in my circles, imagined hooking up with them, and found myself excited and intrigued at the prospect. The term ābiā felt right.4
Of course, impostor syndrome set in again (more on that in a future post).
But I found a community of bisexuals with similar experiences who were still claiming the label. Plus, sexual orientation is primarily about who you have the capacity to be attracted toānot necessarily who youāve had sex with. So, I said āfuck the hatersā and have been gradually sinking deeper into what this part of my identity means for me, ecstatic to have that additional self-knowledge.
Why Does This Matter?
When we understand the nuances of attraction and desire, we gain a deeper understanding of ourselves. We’re able to clearly communicate our boundaries, needs, and wants to others. And eventually, we can let go of the pressure to fit into predetermined boxes so that we can explore what feels true to us.
If a term resonates with you, use it. If it stops feeling right, shift. You donāt need anyoneās permission to understand yourself better.
And if all of this sounds like a tangled mess right now, donāt worry. Youāre not alone. Weāre all just trying to untangle the chains.
For myself, I currently identify as bisexual, demisexual, and am exploring whether aegosexual also fitsāa term describing people who enjoy sexual content or fantasy without necessarily wanting to participate in it themselves. That oneās still percolating, but itās been eye-opening.
(Oh, and letās just say: being into kink added another deliciously complicated layer.5)
Each of these identities added texture to my self-understanding. But more than that, they offered relief. Naming things allowed me to stop fighting with myself. To stop wondering if I was just broken, confused, or doing queerness āwrong.ā
And thatās really what I want this series to do for others:
To open up the definitions.
To demystify the categories.
To let people find themselves without needing permission.
Because you donāt need anyoneās approval to identify with a word that helps you understand yourself. You donāt need to explain why a term fits you to make it yours.
You donāt need to prove your queerness to be queer.
So this post is a beginning. A map of the ground Iāve covered, and the trail Iām still tracing. In future entries, Iāll dig deeper into the identities Iāve touched on hereādemisexuality, bisexuality, aegosexualityāand what theyāve meant for me.
But for now, I just want to leave you with this:
There is no wrong way to feel.
There is no wrong way to want.
There is no wrong way to be.
And figuring out your way?
Thatās not selfish.
Thatās sacred.
Coming Soon:
- A cheeky glossary of queer and neurospicy terms
- Tooltip pop-ups + search-friendly glossary navigation
- Deep dives into demisexuality, bisexuality, aegosexuality, and more
- Maybe a comic about what itās like to explain attraction types to confused friends (or your therapist š )
⨠Until then, stay curious, stay gentle, and stay gloriously weird.āØ
- In case it wasn’t obvious, this is a body-neutral blog. I have a lot to say about growing up fat and living life as a fat adult, and I even hesitate to use the term “fat” because it still feels dirty and wrong, even though it’s categorically not. So more on this coming soon. ā©ļø
- The influence of culture and context on desire can help to explain why alcohol and marijuana (and other substances that help to make us less inhibited) expose us to attractions we might typically brush off or misinterpret. For example, you might experience sexual attraction to someone that your culture tells you shouldnāt (like someone older, or heavier, or of the same gender), which will play a role in your (un)willingness to act on that attraction. But then you have a few drinks, a few tokes, maybe a gummy, and the opinions of society start to matter less (or you just forget them entirely); suddenly, the only thing that matters is that you’re feeling a pull and you want to act on it. (Obviously, other things still matterālike consent and all participating parties being in the right frame of mind to give it willinglyābut in terms of desire, social norms no longer bear as strong an influence). ā©ļø
- High sex drive & ADHD research citations coming soon. ā©ļø
- Iām not sure I even want to dip my toe into the muddy waters that is the discourse of bi vs. pan. Iāve read so many definitions of each term, I have no idea who subscribes to which, and Iām not really even sure what the meaningful difference is anymore. The most compelling distinction Iāve encountered is that both describe the ability to be attracted to more than one gender, but sex characteristics play a role in the attraction for bisexuals, while for pansexuals they are largely irrelevant. Under that definition, I probably fall more into the pan camp, but for whatever reason ābiā resonates better, so thatās what Iām sticking with for now. Would love to hear othersā thoughts on this though! š¤ š ā©ļø
- Thereās a fascinating overlap between kink, queerness, and neurodivergence. For more, check out research by Pearson & Hodgetts (2023) and Muzacz (2021)āand keep an eye out for a future post where I spill (some of) the tawdry details and plunge deeper into the pleasures of kink šāļøāš„š¶ļø. ā©ļø

Leave a Reply